Wednesday, May 25, 2011

@reginaholliday artwork hanging at Nottingham Contemporary #hcdc #thewalkinggallery

Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Let's talk about Rainbow Button Initiative as our HIE at HealthCa.mp/dc on 6/8/11 (#hcdc at #kpcth)

Today I read a report from a recent speech by David Blumenthal, until recently the National Health IT Coordinator. The part that stood out most from the speech was the one that also formed the headline for the post:  

Blumenthal: Building national health network could take decades

I completely agree! This is something that I have been saying for a few years. 

While products like Google Health seem to be going in to Stasis and adoption of other Personal Health Records (PHR), such as Dossia, have achieved very little visibility, we are seeing increased examples of integration using Google Health and Microsoft HealthVault.  This is the real value of the Personal Health Record. It is not a destination - it is a conduit. The more we can connect devices and services to these platforms (like the fitbit), the more valuable they become. 

The Health Care Industry and the government has to wake up to the fact that we (the patient and consumer) are the de facto Health Information Exchange. We need a combination of cloud and device PHR solution. They need to work in tandem and not be an either/or solution. Imagine a Fitbit device that could also download an extract of my critical health data and hold it on the device, ready to be accessed via a suitably secure access control challenge.

Make it Simple - The Rainbow Button Initiative

The Federal Government have taken great strides in promoting the Blue Button as a means for Veterans and others to download their personal health data. 

At a recent Patients 2.0 meeting this idea evolved in to the Rainbow Button Initiative

We need a Green Button to allow us to anonymously share our data with organizations.

We need a White Button to leverage the Direct Project and make it easy to share our information, with our personal data, with members of our medical team.

Let's move the idea forward at HealthCa.mp/dc. I have posted a topic on the ideascale board for HealthCa.mp/dc. Come along on Wednesday 8th June and let's move this idea forward.

Let's not spend Billions and still not get what we need

Building a National Health Information Network will cost billions of dollars and take years to complete. The end result will still not meet all of our needs - what happens when we travel outside the country? It will create an information network where the patient is once again on the outside of the network with little visibility in to the information that is being shared about them. 

Let's instead leverage the Personal Health Record and the nascent interoperability and recognize that the patient/consumer/citizen is the de facto Health Information Exchange. We need initiatives like the Rainbow button initiative to make sharing health data simple and understandable. 

We need to leverage the fast paced innovation that is taking place in the wearable device and mhealth sectors.

Come along to HealthCa.mp/dc on Wednesday 8th June at the amazing Kaiser Permanente Center for Total Health  and join in this vital discussion.

Posted via email from More pre-blogspot than pre-posterous

Monday, May 16, 2011

#mhealth Innovation and Reimbursement - it will come #hcdc Come and discuss at healthca.mp/dc on 6/8/11

Mobi Health News has an article today: 

How handheld devices will cannibalize existing medtech

The bottom line is the view that reimbursement, or more accurately - lack of reimbursement, is hindering adoption of new and innovative devices, like hand held ultrasound scanners.

It was interesting to read this article alongside another that cam out the same day on The Health Care Blog:

Wellpoint gets aggressive on inpatient payment changes

Wellpoint is moving to put hospitals in it's networks on a performance plan whereby future increases will be based on a formula for outcomes, patient safety and patient satisfaction. 

The Switch to pay for Performance is an important step in opening up opportunities for innovative solutions. The idea of paying for the number of emails a physician handles is crazy. It just perpetuates the pay for volume approach of the past. By switching to a quality-based payment method institutions and providers that adopt innovative solutions that improve patient care while making them more efficient will see the rewards.

Posted via email from More pre-blogspot than pre-posterous

#Skype + Microsoft - What it might mean for Telehealth

Faisal Qureshi (@Faisal_Q) posted a question to me on Twitter after I re-posted a Techcrunch article on Microsoft and Apple heading for a Face-off.

Faisal's question was "Will it disrupt Telehealth?"

My view on the TechCrunch post is that the real battle is with Google. Facetime is not currently a player in telephony, chat and video calling. Google is.

Pastedgraphic-1

Let's take a look at that question.

In the past year I have seen a growing interest in using video calling technology amongst payers and providers. It is seen as a way to support the team sport of Health Care. My reservations have been that IT organizations have promoted the use of the same IT-supported Unified Communications infrastructure that they use inside their firewalls. The problem with this is that it is a radically different world out there. The proliferation of Smartphones and tablets means that interoperability is critical. 

If there is one thing that the Skype deal can bring to the table for Microsoft it is Voice and Video Calling that is NOT tied to a particular Operating System. Yes I know that Microsoft Messenger is available for the Mac but outside the Windows world other platforms have been treated as second class citizens. Just compare the capabilities of a Microsoft Live Meeting on a Mac or iPad against the capabilities delivered by services such as WebEx.

If we see Skype integrated with screen sharing and video calling, without feature crippling non-windows platforms then there is hope. 

If we want voice and video calls to take off they have to work regardless of the end points involved. 

But how does this apply to Telehealth?

Two things could happen.

1. Microsoft integrates Skype in to enterprise products like Amalga and even HealthVault.

2. Apple fixes Facetime on iOS to allow calls over 3G (Apple really needs to do this. Facetime needs to just work). Apple releases Facetime for Windows and Android. Yes - that seems a little far fetched, but if Apple wants to be a player in the video calling market then they need to spread Facetime far beyond their MAC OS and iOS realms.  

I would like to see Apple release Facetime for Windows, just like they did with iTunes. It could help sell more iPhones and iPads. I would also like to see them release their Facetime code as open source. This would allow developers to create Linux and Android versions that could interoperate. 

As things stand Facetime does not fit the Apple "It just works" ethos. You have to be on a Wi-Fi network. You have to know your calling party has an iPhone, iPod Touch or iPad2, or has installed Facetime on their Mac. There is no Chat feature. I am surprised that Facetime hasn't been integrated in to iChat. 

Ubiquity is the platform for disruption

Ubiquity is the platform for disruption.  But Ubiquity does not mean 100% adoption. Look at the power of Twitter and Facebook. They do not have 100% adoption but the impact they have is enormous. 

As I recently tweeted about Susannah Fox's Pew Internet Study - "The Social Life of Health Information, 2011" When you are reaching 1 in 5 Americans then you can be considered "mainstream."  We need Video calling to reach the same level of penetration. We also need it to "Just work."

When that happens, Innovators in Health Care will seize these tools to create new and more efficient and effective solutions to solve health challenges. You are already seeing this happen with trail blazers like AmericanWell.

Posted via email from More pre-blogspot than pre-posterous

Sunday, May 15, 2011

Why Microsoft’s Skype purchase means a Face-off with Apple’s Facetime

Microsoft’s purchase of Skype for $8.5 billion in cash is a massive bet for the tech giant.

Although it look like it may well have over-paid by $4.5 billion, and bid against companies who weren’t seriously in the running (Google and Facebook), owning Skype means Microsoft has a much better positioning in mobile.

But that’s not all.

The implications of this deal for Facebook are actually far more interesting. Since Microsoft is an investor in Facebook, the latter will now have deep access to its investor’s assets.

Being able to Skype from within Facebook means Mark Zuckerberg will not have to build his own VOIP communications platform – a seriously complex affair for 600 million users. Plus, the social network already has tie-ins with Skype.

But it also means both Microsoft and Facebook now have a stick with which to beat Apple and its emerging comms platform, Facetime.

With Facebook integration Skype will not be so heavily linked to an actual device – as Facetime is with Apple devices. Note that Microsoft has pledged to “continue to invest in and support Skype clients on non-Microsoft platforms”.

This means Apple is going to have to really pull of the stops on its communications strategy. Perhaps that’s what the new server farm is for?

Posted via email from More pre-blogspot than pre-posterous

Thursday, May 12, 2011

Facebook's loss of trust the seed of doubt is sown - great post from Michael Arrington on @techcrunch

Michael Arrington wrote a fascinating post on TechCrunch today about Facebook secretly employing a PR firm to smear Google. 

The seemingly invincible Facebook doesn't seem so confident today. The bigger question is what seed of doubt has been sown in the mind of Facebook's users.  When a company holds so much power over our data they have to be perceived as straight and above board. Facebook's constant changing of policies around privacy raise the question of "Who benefits?"

Facebook has been growing at a crazy pace and the financial deals that have been struck just increase the pressure to perform. Crude acts like this smear campaign just go to show that Facebook is desperate to keep growing quickly and to monetize the social graph we have donated to them. The chatter around the introduction of Facebook's local deals offering suggest that they are resorting to crude and heavy handed techniques that may not be in the best interests of their users and the ecosystem that depends upon Facebook.

If Facebook wants to own us and our social graph then they have to act in a responsible and straight forward manner. 

Google is not beyond reproach but they do at least appear to position themselves as not holding our data hostage. Facebook -  not so much.

Posted via email from More pre-blogspot than pre-posterous

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

Qualcomm stimulate the imagination with $10M X Prize Star Trek Tricorder contest

Yesterday, Qualcomm created a $10M X Prize. The objective is a Tricorder type device that we all remember from the TV Series, Star Trek. With the growing shortage of physicians we will need tools like this that allow patients to monitor their health.


How will we see this manifest itself - Think about a wireless sensor that can communicate with an App on your iPhone, iPad or Android smart phone.

What would you invent?


Qualcomm and the X Prize Foundation Move to Energize Diagnostics with $10M ‘Tricorder Prize’

Bruce V. Bigelow 5/10/11

Qualcomm (NASDAQ: QCOM) chairman and CEO Paul Jacobs revealed today that the San Diego-based wireless technology giant has been working with the X Prize Foundation to develop criteria for a new $10 million X Prize grand challenge that is straight out of Star Trek—a “Tricorder X Prize.”

The idea—which is still being distilled—is to offer a $10 million incentive prize to the team that can develop the first diagnostic device that actually works like the ubiquitous medical tricorder of Star Trek fame. Generally speaking, the technology would have to be portable, use wireless sensors, be minimally invasive, and capable of providing rapid, low-cost diagnoses of medical ailments and injuries. Oh, and organizers also want the gadget to be able to diagnose patients better than or equal to a panel of board-certified physicians.

Posted via email from More pre-blogspot than pre-posterous

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Microsoft Buys Skype for $8.5B. What next for Microsoft Messenger and Microsoft's Unified Communications Platform?

In the past few years Microsoft has invested heavily in Unified Communications and Enterprises have been implementing the Microsoft platform for their Voice and Video communications needs, at least inside their organizations. 

Now Microsoft has apparently purchased Skype for $8.5B (See the OM Malik post on GigaOm).

What is interesting in all this is where this leaves Microsoft Messenger. There are in fact two versions of Messenger: The consumer facing version and the Enterprise Version that integrates with Active Directory. For a period, at least on the Mac platform the two versions were integrated in to a single product. But lately that has become two difficult to coordinate so Enterprise Users have to run a different application.

It will be interesting to see how Microsoft now evolves their Instant Messenger Voice and Video platform. They now have three code bases to integrate.

What does Skype bring to Microsoft?

Skype brings a solution with a track record of being available everywhere. Skype has been designed to communicate from behind firewalls. It brings relationships with Carriers that are growing and not faltering. 

The real win is in the mobile space. It is just about the only game in town if Microsoft wants to stay relevant in mobile with a cross-platform Voice and Video solution. Without Skype Microsoft Win Phone 7 would have two choices: 1. Live with Google Talk or 2. Implement a FaceTime compliant product. Neither choice would be attractive.

What will be really interesting to see is if Skype will resist being absorbed in to the usual Microsoft strategy of Windows First and Foremost. When you look at the Unified Communications offerings from Microsoft you see a nod towards other platforms, but the reality is that Mac and Linux are treated as second class citizens. Have you tried to find the drivers to run Microsoft LiveMeeting on a Mac? 

I can see Skype being integrated in to Windows Phone 7. Will it be integrated in to the Unified Communications Portfolio? It needs to be. But will it become more Microsoft Messenger like or will Microsoft let Messenger whither and die. With Microsoft's investment in Facebook it looks like Facebook may end up driving the decision. If Facebook and Skype complete their hook up you can see Skype being integrated in to Facebook Chat and giving Facebook a video chat solution. If this happens then the sheer weight of the Facebook community may sound the death knell for Messenger.

The knock on effects in the Instant Messaging world may be extensive. Skype may be ubiquitous but it is largely a stand alone solution. It does not integrate well with other messaging platforms. In that respect Skype is very much in the traditional Microsoft Style. 

We know one thing: Interesting times lie ahead. 

Posted via email from More pre-blogspot than pre-posterous

Monday, May 09, 2011

#hcdc BlogtalkRadio session for HealthCampDC

This Tuesday May 10, 2011 at 5p PST/8p EST healthca.mp/radio talking about healthca.mp/dc #hcdc happening on  6.8.11 at the Kaiser Permanete Center For Total Health, 700 Second Street NE, Washington DC.

Tickets for the event are available now for a $25 donation. Goto http://2.healthca.mp/lWuJPJ or http://healthcampdc11.eventbrite.com.
Go grab your ticket now and tell your colleagues. 

DC Health Innovation Week

HealthCa.mp/dc is part of Health Innovation Week in Washington DC.

Check out the schedule:
June 7th - The Walking Gallery - http://thewalkinggallery.eventbrite.com/
June 8th - HealthCa.mp/dc - http://healthcampdc11.eventbrite.com
June 11th - Health 2.0 Developer Challenge Code-a-Thon - http://www.health2challenge.org/code-a-thon/washington-dc-june-11-2011/

If you know of other health related events happening in the Capital area during this week please let us know! · 6:19 AM

Mark Scrimshire
....Sent from my iPhone

Posted via email from More pre-blogspot than pre-posterous

Friday, May 06, 2011

#hcdc HealthCa.mp/dc on 6.8.11 at #KPCTH in Washington DC. Walkthrough of the Center For Total Health

On Wednesday June 8th HealthCa.mp/dc takes place at the new Kaiser Permanente Center For Total Health (700 Second St NE, Washington DC). Participant Tickets go on Sale on Sunday May 8th at 9am EST. 

The video below gives you a preview of the amazing venue and outlines how we are planning to organize the day.

You can get tickets at http://healthca.mp/dc or http://healthcampdc11.eventbrite.com. Tickets are being offered with a donation being requested ($25 or $10 if you are a full-time student). If you want to give a larger donation we will be very appreciative. The money raised from ticket sales goes towards hosting the event and promoting other HealthCamp events around the country and around the world.

Posted via email from More pre-blogspot than pre-posterous

Thursday, May 05, 2011

Build Your Social Media presence one by one. Ten Rules for Health Care Organizations Interested in Using Social Media | The Health Care Blog

By

JAAN SIDOROV, MD

Include social media like ”Facebook” or “Twitter” in health care business plan, and you’ll probably prompt glazed looks from the average health care administrator. Those who recognize the terms will want to know what they have to do with filling up that new heart catheterization suite or increasing referrals to their infusion center.  They’re too busy with marketing flotsam like “Top 100″ billboard campaigns or convincing the local news media to mention that newly renovated lobby. These functionaries look, but they do not see.

Case in point: during a recent work-out at the local fitness center, the Disease Management Care Blog  witnessed two elder women chatting while speed-walking on side-by-side treadmills.  Down the row were two younger women on side-by-side exercise bicycles, also chatting.  The difference was that the two younger women had ear plugs in place, their cell phones out and were simultaneously texting.  All four women were continuously talking at the same time, but that’s not the point.  The point is that two-way web-based cellular communication is fast becoming a 24-7 standard for tens of millions of people.  Those two elders may currently command greater purchasing power, but those texting youngsters is where the future lies.

As mentioned in yesterday’s post, health care organizations that realize that they need to get the attention of the two women on those exercise bikes will find it extremely challenging.  That’s because those ladies will have to “opt-in” and agree to “friend” or “follow” you.

While social media is just as new to population health providers, the DMCB thinks they’ll have a leg up because they have been in the “opt-in” business for over a decade.  After doing some reading and talking to some colleagues in the disease management industry, here are ten insights that can help other health care organizations such as accountable care organizations, integrated delivery systems, medical homes or other provider organizations build followers, tweeps, and friends the opt-in world of social media:

1) Offer brief, personalized, meaningful and relevant content: mass messaging and links to milquetoast advice offer little value.  Efficiently written humor, unique insights and actionable information need to make the effort it takes for your customers to pay attention worthwhile. Being snarky , rude and pushy isn’t necessarily bad. Extra points for catering to “micro” communities.

2) Expect slow uptake, one person at a time: adoption is non-linear, starting slowly and building as awareness grows to, if you do this right, a tipping point.  While big Twitter communities weren’t built in a day, the good news is that once a base of readers/friends/followers is established, it won’t easily go away.

3) It’s a part of a larger coherent marketing and branding strategy: traditional communication ”channels” still have a role to play.  Print, email and phone calls should continue in addition to tweets and postings.

4) Aim it relevant generational health issues – current younger users of social media are more likely to be interested in personally important issues like health promotion, obesity or child care.  Chronic conditions like diabetes or hypertension are less relevant…. for now.

5) Incentives are OK: assuming you can get past the kick-back, privacy and insurance rules, think gift certificates or raffles for sign-ups as well as referrals. It works in employer settings, why not out on the net?

6) Worries? Yes, including HIPAA, creepy data mining, hacking, surveillance, cyber-bullying and predatory behavior.  You’ll need to be up-front with friends and tweeples about this and promptly notify them of any problems.

7) It’s messy: the likelihood that this can be predictably planned is very low.  Flexible adaptation and trying to get buy-in from a skeptical audience means this will be more of a journey than a destination.

8) Social media networking is important: in addition to building your community of individuals, you’ll need to interact with other Twitterers, Facebook pages and blogs.  Play nice with them and they’ll notify others about you.

9) Prize relationships: this is a two-way street, which means you have to have a reputation for listening. That means being aware of any community “buzz” and promptly answering all individual questions, comments and concerns.

10) It isn’t cheap: This takes time. This has to be supported with policy and procedure. This requires training and staffing. This needs money.

Jaan Sidorov, MD, is a primary care internist and former Medical Director at Geisinger Health Plan with over 20 years experience in primary care, disease management and population-based care coordination. He shares his knowledge and insights at Disease Management Care Blog, where this post first appeared.

Filed Under: THCB

Tagged: , , , , May 5, 2011

Jaan offers some common sense guidelines for stepping in to Social Media. The bottom line, don't treat it as another mass media channel. You build an engaged channel one person at a time.

Posted via email from More pre-blogspot than pre-posterous

CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield wins award for confusing statement | Washington Business Journal

Which form do you think is easier to understand: Tax instructions from the IRS or an explanation of benefits from CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield?

The IRS instructions, by a long shot. So says the Center for Plain Language, a Silver Spring-based nonprofit dedicated to the cause of ridding the world of unnecessarily complicated legalese.

CareFirst won the center's 2011 WonderMark Award, given for the "least usable document." Specifically, the insurance company won for a standard explanation of benefits document sent to a Maryland customer.

Meanwhile, the IRS won the center's grand prize ClearMark Award, given to the forms and websites that best use plain language to communicate with users. Specifically, the center praised the IRS' easy-to-find instructions, "active voice," and effective use of the pronouns we and you to "clearly and personally identify the party who has the duty."

Though it doesn't dwell on CareFirst's shortcomings, the explanation of benefits displays none of those qualities.

A CareFirst spokesman has not yet returned an email seeking comment. In fairness, it's worth noting that some of the confusing language in the insurance document is required by Maryland law. So while not entirely blameless, CareFirst is just following orders from an equally confusing bureaucracy.

benfischer@bizjournals.com or 703.258.0828.
Twitter.com/fischer_biz

In HealthCare the EOB is too often an oxymoron. Neither an explanation Nor a Benefit.

There is so much to be done in this space. We need to crowd source solutions since so many of use receive these currently useless documents.

Who do you think provides the best example of an Explanation of Benefits (EOB)?

Posted via email from More pre-blogspot than pre-posterous

Wednesday, May 04, 2011

Evidence-based Medicine gives way to Evidence-based Health but what we need is Evidence-based Choices via #mHealth

Dr. Pauline Chen writes a great article in the Health Section of the New York Times: "When Doctor's Advice Is Ignored At Home. "  I read this immediately after reading a LinkedIn Innovations In Health Group Post that asked the question: "What is the future of telehealth? Do you think the initial cost justifies potential future savings?"

I added my own thoughts to Korstiaan's question:

Mark Scrimshire • I am seeing fascinating developments in body-worn and proximity sensors. When these are introduced in to the TeleHealth/mHealth portfolio there is a massive opportunity to deliver a great return on Investment for both families and health systems. The ROI will occur in two principal areas: 

- Hospital Re-admissions: Equipping a discharged patient with a device to enable remote assessment and feedback can help patients and care givers to comply with their care instructions. 

- Aging In Place: As the population ages there will be a growing demand for tools and solutions that help seniors stay independent. This will allow family caregivers to monitor a senior remotely without being intrusive. This should prove to be very attractive to families if it puts off the day when a senior either moves in to their home, or moves to an assisted living community. 

The caveat to all this is that the solutions being developed have to be consumer centric, easy to use or better still invisible in use. 

Health Care needs to learn lessons from companies like Apple. The iPod was a transformative device. Not because it was using new technologies but because it packaged hardware and software together in an innovative way that was easy for consumers to use.

My thoughts then turned to Pauline's article and the issue of the breakdown of Evidence-based Medicine and the emergence of Evidence-based Health. From my perspective the limited success of Evidence-based Medicine is not surprising. The re-focusing towards Evidence-based Health is logical and appears to yield more successful.

However, It is still not enough. I believe that we won't see real success from Evidence-based practices until we actually include the patient in the Evidence loop. We need to move towards a practice of what I call "Evidence-based Choices."

The idea behind Evidence-based Medicine was to provide doctors and other medical professionals the data that would lead to improvements in the practice of medicine. That is an admirable goal but it only goes part of the way to the solution. Real progress comes from engaging the Patient in the loop.

Successful medicine is accomplished WITH the patient, not TO the patient.

The Evidence-based Health Initiative puts medical professionals in to the community to help remove barriers to good care for the patient. But with Primary Care Doctors becoming a scarce commodity we need to develop new practices. We need to leverage the potential of mHealth to put tools, devices and sensors in to the reach of patients and present information in a simple, concise manner that can influence real-life choices that lead to better care for patients. This is the true potential of mHealth - Evidence-based Choices.

Posted via email from More pre-blogspot than pre-posterous

Sunday, May 01, 2011

#tcamp11 fascinating insight in to congress by @loreleikelly

At TransparencyCamp 2011 with Lorelei Kelly - @loreleikelly.

Mind blowing level of expertise about the workings of Congress.

http://newstrategicsecurityinitiative.org/ - Afghanistan Congressional Information Hub - clunky one page briefings that went viral.

How do we get information in to Congress in a timely manner. Lobbyists have money to be able to quickly mobilize favorable expertise do this, public interest groups don't.

We need to make sure Transparency is not adversarial on the hill. Brow beating public officials is not productive.

Sunlight wants to see Lobbyist activity on Capitol Hill in more detail in real time. Like a mandatory Lobbyist Foursquare for Congress and Professional Lobbyists. It would enable us to create a heat map of activity.

USA has a believability problem as we approach Junk Bond Status as a country. 

"Go back to your district and find policy experts."  then mobilize them. They have the potential to leverage relationships with their elected representatives.

Reputation is critical. Who hasn't been bought.

The telephone area code is a simple filter mechanism used by hill staffers to cope with information overload. If the area code is not in my district they wouldn't pick up the phone in busy periods.

So much money in DC that the only channel to leverage is District-based high value relationships.

If you are involved in policy Go and make friends with your district representative and let them know your expertise and focus. They will call for help. 

Purging the institutional memory in Congress has proved to be an effective way to concentrate power.

iPads on the house floor has the potential to change access. 

Cultivate your local journalists.

Posted via email from More pre-blogspot than pre-posterous

#tcamp11 The opening Session kicks off

It is Sunday morning and day 2 of TransparencyCamp is kicking off. 

The objective is to kick off projects. The 3pm session is an Action Session. What do you want to build out of Transparency Camp.

Now for a couple of lightning presentations.

Andrew McLaughlin - Code for America. Talking about Civic Commons: Sharing technology for the public good.

Building common code stacks for common solutions. 

Michael Morisy - Muckrock.com

A simple way to submit Freedom of Information requests.

Started with a simple form. Added features when they knew it would be used.

Components: DocumentCloud, Django and Spot.us

Hard work now is okay - if you are working on the right things.

Think Small: Easier to build, maintain.

Play Favorites: Don't try to please everybody. Focus. Small core of passionate users.

FollowTheMoney.org - Providing the facts so you can draw conclusions.

Tracking political donations in all 50 states. Follow the influencers.

Journalists rely on the data because it is verifiable. Accuracy is with 1-2%.

David Moore - OpenGovernment.org - Participatory Politics Foundation.

Making legislative information accessible. Works with Sunlight Foundation's OpenStates Project.

Ruby on Rails open source code base that can be remixed for other projects.

RSS Feeds and Open API.

Demo of Beta message builder to congress that allows simple click to pull information about political contributions and other data in to an email.  Very Neat!

Erica Fowler talking about Wesleyan Media Project. Tracking all political tv ads in real time.

Sunlight and Knight Foundation were early sponsors. They now pull storyboards and full video files of TV ads.

A great ability to identify who is spending, on what, where and about what.  Can also show tone of Ads. Party Sponsored Ads are the most negative. Interest Groups are second most negative group.

CityCamp - 4 goals:

- bring together people to share perspectives about the cities they live in.
- Create and maintain patterns for local government
- Foster a community of practices
- Create outcomes from each camp.

Gov2.0 goes local. It is an Un-Conference.

Came from Transparency Camp and Gov2.0 and focused on local.

Open Source brand. 
Check out Meetups on meetup.com

/CityCamp+data+catalog
/CityCamp+ideation
/CityCamp+camp

Posted via email from More pre-blogspot than pre-posterous