Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Extra! Extra! Read all about it! Steve Jobs (@FSJ) achieves total reality distortion before a product is even released

Old habits die hard. Rupert Murdoch believes that the future of the newspaper business is subscriptions—electronic subscriptions. He’s done with giving away his news for free on the Web and to search engines like Google. Instead thinks that Kindle-like tablet computers can save the media industry. It’s a notion that’s been floated before: an entire newsstand in a color tablet

which delivers electronic versions of any newspaper or magazine you want for a monthly subscription of $15 to $19 a month.

It’s got to work, otherwise, he warns from his soapbox, “Newspapers will go out of business. All newspapers.” In an interview on his own Fox Business

(embedded below), he explains his thinking:

ALEXIS GLICK: ARE YOU CONVINCED IT IS GOING TO WORK?

RUPERT MURDOCH: SURE.

ALEXIS GLICK: WHY?

RUPERT MURDOCH: WE TEST MARKETED IT AND PEOPLE I THINK UNDERSTAND THAT IT’S PERFECTLY FAIR THAT THEY ARE GOING TO PAY FOR IT. IF IT DOESN’T, THE NEWSPAPERS WILL GO OUT OF BUSINESS. ALL NEWSPAPERS. THERE IS JUST NOT ENOUGH ADVERTISING TO GO AROUND FOR ALL THE SITES ON THE INTERNET. THE NUMBER OF SITES AND AVAILABILITY OF ADVERTISING ON THE INTERNET, THE AVAILABILITY DOUBLES AND TRIPLES EVERY YEAR BUT THE AMOUNT OF REAL MONEY GOES UP 10 OR 15% A YEAR. THE PRICE OF IT KEEPS COMING DOWN.

Forget for a moment that news websites will be perfectly readable on these newfangled tablets everyone keeps talking about. So Murdoch still has the problem of “>”leading” all of his media competitors into the promised land of subscription tablets by walling off their websites from readers. And also set aside the fact that newspapers and magazines are already available for paid download on Amazon’s Kindle, and that those subscription revenues are still miniscule. A full-color tablet with access to an entire newsstand’s worth of magazines and newspapers for a single bundled price would be a better deal and better experience than buying subscriptions a la carté from the Kindle.

But in the face of free content readable via a browser, the subscription model will be challenged. Even setting aside competition from newer media sites and blogs with lower cost structures and lean staffs, there is no way to completely wall off news from every traditional news organization. At the very least, the weakest newspapers and magazines with the lowest readership and share of attention will find that they are better off remaining free and selling Web ads than taking crumbs from the new electronic subscrtiption pie. (Presumably the subscription revenue will be divvied up based on demand, with the most popular titles getting the largest portion).

Apparently, Murdoch also has no interest in simply playing Bing off of Google and making the search engines pay for the right to index his news either. Asked whether he was “moving towards an exclusive deal” with the “aggregators and the Googles of the world” to make them “pay for News Corp. content,” Murdoch replied:

NO, NO, NO. I DON’T KNOW THAT THEY CAN AFFORD TO DO THAT. IF THEY WERE TO PAY EVERYBODY FOR EVERYTHING THEY TOOK FROM EVERY NEWSPAPER IN THE WORLD, AND EVERY MAGAZINE, THEY WOULDN’T HAVE ANY PROFITS LEFT.

You got that? Even if he were to sell his news to Google, which he is not, Google doesn’t have enough money to buy it. Either that, or Murdoch is negotiating in public as Google’s search deal with MySpace comes up for renewal.

Video and partial transcript below:

Transcript excerpt via Fox Business News

ALEXIS GLICK: YOU HAVE MADE A LOT OF NEWS ABOUT AGGREGATORS AND GOOGLES OF THE WORLD AND WHETHER THEY SHOULD PAY FOR NEWS CORP. CONTENT. ARE YOU MOVING TOWARD EXCLUSIVE DEAL WITH THEM?

RUPERT MURDOCH: NO, NO, NO. I DON’T KNOW THAT THEY CAN AFFORD TO DO THAT. IF THEY WERE TO PAY EVERYBODY FOR EVERYTHING THEY TOOK FROM EVERY NEWSPAPER IN THE WORLD, AND EVERY MAGAZINE, THEY WOULDN’T HAVE ANY PROFITS LEFT. THEY HAVE DEVISED A BRILLIANT SEARCH ENGINE THAT SCRAPES ALL OF THE MATERIAL PUBLISHED IN THE WORLD, AND ON THE BACK OF THAT THEY SELL SEARCH, BUT THEY DON’T PAY FOR THE RAW MATERIAL. WE HAVE TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT THAT. WE CAN PUBLISH OUR PAPERS ELECTRONICALLY, AND OTHERS CAN TOO, AND PEOPLE CAN STILL GO TO A SEARCH ENGINE IF THEY WANT TO FIND OUT SOMETHING, NOT NEWS PERHAPS, BUT THEY SEE TERMS THAT NEWS REFERS TO IN NEWSPAPER STORIES AND MAGAZINES THEY CAN EITHER GO TO GOOGLE OR MICROSOFT OR WHOEVER. THEY’LL STILL HAVE A VERY GOOD BUSINESS.

ALEXIS GLICK: YOU ENVISION A WORLD THEN WITH A TABLET, A HANDHELD DEVICE OR SOMETHING OF THAT NATURE WHERE YOU CAN OFFER A FINANCIAL MARKETPLACE OR A SUPERMARKET FULL OF MEDIA CONTENT AND DATA ON A MULTI-TIERED SYSTEM?

RUPERT MURDOCH: YES.

ALEXIS GLICK: HOW DOES THAT WORK?

RUPERT MURDOCH: WELL, YOU’D BE ABLE TO GET ON IT, AS WOULD BE TRANSMITTED TO IT, A TABLET. TRANSMITTED THROUGH THE AIR OR OVER WI-FI. A REASONABLE SIZE, ATTRACTIVE TABLET IN FULL COLOR AND YOU COULD READ A NEWSPAPER ON IT. YOU PRESS A BUTTON WHEN YOU WANT IT OR IF YOU WANT TO PLAY EXTRA, MORE THAN THAT, BUT IF IT COSTS $15 OR $19 A MONTH, IF YOU WANTED TRAVEL MAGAZINES OR SOMETHING YOU CAN ORDER THEM UP AND HAVE THEM.

ALEXIS GLICK: ON THE TABLET, IF I PAY THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT I CAN HAVE ANYTHING I WANT?

RUPERT MURDOCH: ANY CONTENT. BOOKS, ANYTHING AT ALL. YOU JUST HAVE TO PAY. THAT’S THE FUTURE. IT COSTS A FORTUNE. THE NEWSPAPER INDUSTRY – THE NEWS INDUSTRY, PUT IT THAT WAY. LET’S NOT TALK ABOUT PAPER. THE NEWS INDUSTRY SPENDS A FORTUNE IN COLLECTING THE NEWS. IT NEEDS TO BE PAID FOR IT. THERE IS NOT ENOUGH ADVERTISING TO GO AROUND. IT’S ALRIGHT ON CABLE TELEVISION BECAUSE IT GETS PAID BY THE CABLE SUPPLIERS, MONEY, WHICH, OF COURSE, GETS PASSED ON TO THE PUBLIC. AS WELL AS SUPPLEMENTED BY SOME ADVERTISING AND IT HAS TO BE THE SAME WITH OTHER FORMS OF NEWS.

ALEXIS GLICK: ARE YOU CONVINCED IT IS GOING TO WORK?

RUPERT MURDOCH: SURE.

ALEXIS GLICK: WHY?

RUPERT MURDOCH: WE TEST MARKETED IT AND PEOPLE I THINK UNDERSTAND THAT IT’S PERFECTLY FAIR THAT THEY ARE GOING TO PAY FOR IT. IF IT DOESN’T, THE NEWSPAPERS WILL GO OUT OF BUSINESS. ALL NEWSPAPERS. THERE IS JUST NOT ENOUGH ADVERTISING TO GO AROUND FOR ALL THE SITES ON THE INTERNET. THE NUMBER OF SITES AND AVAILABILITY OF ADVERTISING ON THE INTERNET, THE AVAILABILITY DOUBLES AND TRIPLES EVERY YEAR BUT THE AMOUNT OF REAL MONEY GOES UP 10 OR 15% A YEAR. THE PRICE OF IT KEEPS COMING DOWN.

News Corporation image

Website: newscorp.com
Location:New York, New York, United States
Founded: 1980

News Corp is the world’s largest media conglomerate company.

News Corporation is a diversified global media company with operations in eight industry segments: filmed entertainment; television; cable network programming; direct broadcast satellite… Learn More

Google image

Website: google.com
Location:Mountain View, California, United States
Founded: September 7, 1998
IPO: August 19, 2004

Google primarily provides search and advertising services, which together aim to organize and monetize the world’s information. In addition to its dominant search engine, it offers a plethora of tools and platforms including its more popular… Learn More

Amazon Kindle 2 image

Company: Amazon
Website: amazon.com/kindle
Launch Date: February 24, 2009

Amazon’s Kindle 2 is a mobile eBook reader. It was announced on February 9, 2009. An update on the original Amazon Kindle, Kindle 2 weighs 10.2 oz, has 7 times the storage space of… Learn More

Information provided by CrunchBase

As the Newspaper industry struggles to find a viable business model it appears that the legend of Steve Jobs reaches new heights.

He appears to have Google and Microsoft playing off against each other while convincing the Newspaper industry (okay - may be just Rupert Murdoch) that the Tablet is their only savior.

This is amazing since Apple haven't even released their much rumored tablet yet.

Posted via web from More pre-blogspot than pre-posterous

From Ted Eytan’s blog: “Now Reading: Patients actually want their entire medical record” | e

From Ted Eytan’s blog: “Now Reading: Patients actually want their entire medical record”

by e-Patient Dave on November 15, 2009

An important study just got my attention. Patients and clinicians in different cities were asked questions about concerns and preferences. Titled “Insights for Internists: ‘I Want the Computer to Know Who I Am’,” the study reports: (emphasis added)

  • Patients do keep their own medical records
  • They want access to everything in their record
  • Privacy worries “appeared to fade rapidly in the face of the desire to have records fully available in emergency settings and with multiple and new providers”
  • Click to read on Ted's blog

    “health professionals professed far more concern about maintaining privacy than patients.”

  • They understand that their clinicians are busy/stressed, they want the information to supplement and make their (clinicians) work more efficient, not less

Boy do I wish we’d all known about this during the debates about meaningful use and medical records this summer! There was so much talk about “Well what do people want?” and “Won’t patients be overwhelmed? They won’t be able to understand it.”

And here’s the thing: it was published back in May, and the research was done THREE YEARS AGO, Nov. 2006 to Jan. 2007.

How’s that for a great example of the “lethal lag time” we talk about in the e-patient white paper?  That’s the delay between when new knowledge comes into existence and when it’s made its way through the publication system, for use by decision-makers. Three years, in this case.

Thanks to the always magnificent, e-patient-minded Ted Eytan, MD for highlighting this study on his blog Friday.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg

  • del.icio.us

  • Facebook

  • Google

  • Reddit

  • SphereIt

  • StumbleUpon

  • YahooMyWeb

Comments

4 Responses to “From Ted Eytan’s blog: “Now Reading: Patients actually want their entire medical record””

  1. ICMCC Blog says:

    [...] The reason for this development is that there are few places that keep track of what is published in the field. A good example is the remark by e-patient Dave this Sunday: Boy do I wish we’d all known about this during the debates about meaningful use and medical records this summer! There was so much talk about “Well what do people want?” and “Won’t patients be overwhelmed? They won’t be able to understand it.” From Ted Eytan’s blog: “Now Reading: Patients actually want their entire medical record” [...]

  2. I’m stunned (in a good way) – as the above comment says, that article was posted on their site the same day.

    Here’s where you can subscribe to updates from their site.

  3. Aurelia says:

    Dave,

    I’m wondering if the same issues around privacy exist for controversial diagnoses. For example, psychiatric patients may not want their records to be made fully electronic, for good reason. To this day, discrimination exists even within the medical community against psychiatric patients who have physical illnesses. Which is why they tend to have higher rates of morbidity and mortality than others.

    It can literally kill you if a Doctor finds out you are on antidepressants.

    And employers? Automatically fire anyone with a psychiatric diagnosis. Child welfare authorities are more than happy to seize children from parents on a precautionary basis, with no evidence of harm. Even though patients who take their medication are better workers, and better parents.

    Same for women who have had abortions, or even prenatal diagnosis. In the old days, they would have been recorded correctly in paper files but only billed as D&Cs, which could be post-miscarriage D&Cs, to protect the lives of Doctors and the identity of patients. Pro-lifers have stated quite clearly that they will kill women. Do you think they can’t hire a hacker? I bet they can.

    I appreciate that security exists for people concerned about privacy, but the problem is that even one slip can destroy a life, or destroy a career. And the penalties so far are a joke. They need to be jailable offenses.

    A leg x-ray is not the same thing as a depression diagnosis.

    So I am quite happy to sit back and wait a nice long time for E-Records. I like staying alive.

  4. [...] e-patient info site by e-Patient Dave on November 16, 2009 In last weekend’s post about “patients want all their data” I said I wished I’d known about the article (published mid-May) during last summer’s [...]

 

Similar Posts

@TedEytan highlights an older study. Great info! Patients want to share - it might save our lives.

Posted via web from More pre-blogspot than pre-posterous

Saturday, November 14, 2009

We Need to Engage Directly with Our Customers. They are the Ones that Count. | Omar Ha-Redeye

Great message!

Posted via web from More pre-blogspot than pre-posterous

Friday, November 06, 2009

Apple's App Store hits 100,000, displays ultimate irony - Computerworld Blogs

Apple's iPhone App Store, as long expected, passed the 100,000 app mark today.  Apple has been counting down the milestones since the store opened, last mentioning 85,000 in a conference call last month.  There are some interesting trends developing, however, that put that number into perspective.

First of all, most apps aren't the wild successes that you've heard stories about.  In fact, according to a recent study, if you are not in the top 1000 (or 1%) apps, you aren't going to be installed on more than 1.67% of iPhones and iPods. That same study said that only 20% of all apps ever get more than a few downloads.

Another recent phenomenon has been running up the App Store count.   Books are turning into Apps.  This isn't like the Kindle App which can read many books in the one reader app or purchase books in-app.  Companies like Scrollmotion have engines that turn a lot of recent book releases into seperate, individual apps with little effort.

It isn't just first run books, however.  Companies are taking books in the open domain and building apps around them.  There are probably 10 $.99 War and Peace apps in the store.  

Same goes for most classics. How about Sun Tzu's Art of War? Over 30 apps for one book title.

This free book to cheap app model probably accounts for thousands of "apps".

Finally, all of this belies the ultimate irony for Apple.  For decades, they've been struggling with their Mac platform because most app(lication)s are written for PC first.  Then, sometimes they are written for Mac, sometimes they aren't (and they are also crippled like Microsoft Office).  This has traditionally been the major barrier to entry for prospective Mac customers who've gone to Windows. 

Apple would try to convince people that it wsn't the quanity of applications but the quality, and that native Mac Applications were better.

Over the past five years, the Web and a host of other factors have tempered that trend, but it still exists -especially in the corporate world. 

Now,  Apple is king of the apps in the smartphone realm and spouts their total at every opportunity.  Perhaps they are making up for years of app-envy?

So there are 100,000 apps in the App Store. According to AppShopper (http://Appshopper.com) there are 106,794 apps approved but only 97,435 actually available in the Apps Store.

I don't browse around the App Store much. Instead I tend to listen to the Apps that are being suggested by friends on Twitter. I did take a quick look today and came away wondering if there was an App to count the number of Apps in the App Store?

Posted via web from More pre-blogspot than pre-posterous

Thursday, November 05, 2009

#hcnyc Countdown to HealthCampNYC - 1 day to go!

Once again HealthCamp hits the big apple! Last year HealthCamp took place under the umbrella of the Web 2.0 Expo in the un-conference track. This year, thanks to the the tireless efforts of Eugene Borukhovich (@healthEugene) HealthCampNYC (#hcnyc) stands on its own. Saturday morning at 8:30 sees HealthCampNYc kick off at the Teacher's college in Columbia.

We have worked out an arrangement with the college to allow last minute participants to join in. So head over to http://healthcampnyc.eventbrite.com and grab a ticket and join in.

If you can't make the event in person please check out the Twitter Stream. The CoverItLive feed should be available (See Below) or over on the HealthCa.mp network's wiki at http://bit.ly/hcnyc_w. The CoverItLive feed is on the Discussion page.

Okay, I am off to pack ready for the trip up on Friday. If you make it to HealthCampNYC come and say hello. If you can't make the event but will be near Washington DC on Tuesday December 1st then you could come along to the #SecretDCHealthCamp  ....whoops. I was supposed to be keeping that a secret. So please, don't tell anyone you don't know!

Posted via email from More pre-blogspot than pre-posterous