Saturday, August 28, 2010

#spsbmore SharePoint Saturday in Baltimore

The presenters and volunteers at the kickoff of the day

Mark Scrimshire
B: http://ekive.blogspot.com
....Sent from my iPhone

Posted via email from More pre-blogspot than pre-posterous

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

Untitled

listening to "Simon Harrison (www.basic-soul.co.uk) - 25-08-08 - Basic Soul Radio Show inc Scrimshire Guest Mix" ♫ http://blip.fm/~u4tfp

Posted via email from More pre-blogspot than pre-posterous

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

How Location Services Could Impact Health Care

I showed my dental hygienist who else was checked-in there on Foursquare last time I went to the dentist's office and she was quite taken aback. But we consumers willingly shared our presence at and feedback about that medical facility. That's only the beginning of what's likely to happen.

If health insurance agencies track your location and charge you more for insurance, you're probably not going to appreciate that. There are some possible upsides to the intersection of location and health care, however.

For the Patient

"I would love to see HospitalCompare.com and Health and Human Services (HHS) data mashed up with mobile location apps for health care consumers," says Brian Ahier, Health IT Evangelist at Mid Columbia Medical Center in the Dalles, Oregon. "Helping me find the best pediatrican or orthopedic surgeon would be a great application. And once I'm there, I want to want to lodge a positive or negative complaint on the same service."

"This is all about is the patient," argues Mark Scrimshire, founder of the HealthCamp movement of healthcare unconferences around the world and an employee at a large healthcare payment corporation in the US.

"The one person who is not by their computer during a medical transaction is the patient. They are in the hospital or in the pharmacy. As smartphones take off, there will be tremendous potential for really suplementing the patient and bringing them data that's relevant. Location services could recognize that you are going into a pharmacy, for example, and remind you what your prescriptions are and of anything you needed to talk to your pharmacist about regarding those prescriptions.

"When you walk into the doctor's office, your smartphone should configure your data and prompt you to transmit your health measurements from home quickly and easily, because it knows where you are. I think there's a lot of potential for augmentation of the patient to let them monitor their own health. That will happen through a wide variety of sensors and location is one important factor that will provide context for that sensor data. 'Blood pressure up? Well, he was at work again.'"

Scrimshire also sees location data being served up to Augmented Reality style apps to help patients navigate their way through the maze-like halls of big hospitals - and providing the kind of in-home tracking that would help the elderly stay in place, instead of being institutionalized.

"Putting a few thousand dollars of monitoring equipment into a home, if it prevents someone from visiting an emergency room, it pays for itself with the avoidance of one visit," he argues.

AED Location Database Points to Nearest Life Saving DeviceThese kinds of strategies may be less far-fetched than they seem. Medical providers are already offering Google Maps of the best facilities to seek appropriate care. A University Medical Center in Holland has even built an emergency Augmented Reality display that allows you to look through your mobile phone's camera view and locate the nearest automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) located in a public place.

For the Doctor

There are already systems in place in many hospitals to track medical equipment, but what about tracking the medical professionals themselves?

Brian Ahier works in the same small Oregon town where Google recently built a big data center, The Dalles. Earlier this year Google gave the town a grant to build a free city-wide wifi network. Wifi is just one of several ways that the locations of mobile devices can be tracked.

"If there's an emergency and we need to call up all hands on deck, it would be really handy to be able to pull up a map and see where everyone is," Ahier says. "It would need to be secure, and probably for people who are on call only. It would have to be an opt-in situation by the physician."

Inside the hospital, location data could prove very useful in tracking updates from devices located in various parts of the institution as well.

"At some of the HealthCamps there have been conversations about secure Twitter-like conversations in a hospital environment, even between devices," Mark Scrimshire says.

"Imagine if every bed and device could send and recieve Twitter-like messages. Imagine if you come onto duty and you get the feed of all the updates from all the patients and devices.

"Because of the life or death nature of the industry, it doesn't move that quickly and thus hasn't adopted technology like this. 'Meaningful use' in healthcare right now is about whole-record interoperability, this would be about real-time mashing together of data feeds from different devices and building filters and context. If a patient has a device on them, where are they and how does that relate to other things you're tracking? That makes for better management of the patient. Is a health care provider doing something out of sequence? Location becomes a factor that helps to add context to all these things we could monitor."

Obstacles to the Vision

Some location technologies will likely impact health care sooner than others. There are obstacles to the kind of future that Ahier and Scrimshaw describe. Ahier, for example, says that GPS signals on phones vary too much in accuracy today. And the iPhone is too proprietary for many corporations to build on top of. "Almost all the doctors have iPhones, too," he says. "Even if we give them BlackBerries, they go out and buy their own iPhones."

"Ultimately, I think we're going to need to be platform independent, even device independent," Ahier argues. "We're going to need to be able to use an Ubuntu netbook, an iPad, etc. Our EHR (electronic health records) are going to have to run on all those."

Scrimshaw believes that location technology providers in healthcare will go Google's route and build HTML5 mobile web apps, which nearly every smartphone on the market will soon support.

Scrimshaw believes that the bigger issues are cultural. "The whole industry is very conservative because of privacy," he says.

"HIPAA [the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996] is used as an excuse not to share, but the P is for portability. The big trap door is that we as patients can demand our data, people may want to charge us for us, but our information is our currency. We can decide when and with whom we want to share it.

"Security is going to be the issue the industry is going to through up as an excuse to not do anything. It's been a minefield to get quality data published about doctors and hospitals, it's a minefield to go through. The healthcare industry is still one where there's a lot of advantage to a lack of transparency. You don't realize you could save $200 by going down the road for the same treatment because the information isn't available.

"But some trends are coming together, in part because of the recession. Employers are putting more of the responsibility for paying for health care on the shoulders of employees, through high-deductible insurance plans, for example. When they start feeling the cost more, then they start asking questions and asking if there are other steps they can take. When the onus is put on the consumer, you'll see them demand a change in the healthcare industry. The consumer can demand their information and be more on par with the physician and make decisions. Then you'll start to see the innovators really coming into the picture."

Will location data be a major disruption of the balance of power between the various stakeholders in the healthcare industry? Will it make shopping for health services, or staying healthy, an easier casual activity for more and more people with smartphones?

Will doctors and medical devices be instrumented, tracked, analyzed and more effectively managed to reduce cost and improve the quality of care?

These visions of location-based health care may be a ways off, but they could also be fast approaching. Just today the FCC and the FDA signed an agreement to jointly develop technical standards for wireless-enabled medical devices and services. Location technology and healthcare could come together sooner than we might expect.

Fascinating discussion with Marshall Kirkpatrick. WE haven't even scratched the surface of Location Based Services in HealthCare.

Posted via email from More pre-blogspot than pre-posterous

Saturday, July 17, 2010

Inception Theatrical Review,Inception Synopsis, Should I Watch Inception?| FlickDirect

Reviews > FlickDirect™ Staff Review

Inception Theatrical Review

Marco Duran
7/17/2010 9:17 AM EST

Inception Theatrical Review I did not intend to write a review for Inception.  I didn't want to.  If I plan on writing about a film, I take my notebook and write my notes by glow of the silver screen.  However, when I entered the midnight showing, I went empty handed.  I just wanted to sit back and enjoy the ride.  The lights dimmed; the film played; the curtain closed and something was planted in my head that has since festered and grown, taking over my dreams and my waking mind.  I was compelled to write on what I saw and experienced.  I sit here now, needing to share what I experienced, needing to tell as many as I can to run and have the same experience I did.  A film has not haunted me so much in quite a while.  It is the second of Nolan's films to make me question reality and have me chattering like a gibbon as I left the theater - Memento was the first.  They both messed with my head.  Inception is so well tuned, so well structured, the world it creates is complete and nearly perfect.  I not only understood, but I could easily manipulate the concepts it showed me so that I could see them every day around me.  This is what film is about.

At some undetermined time in the future (or maybe happening now in the present right under our noses) people are able to jack into other's subconscious and invade their dreams.  Dom Cobb (Leonardo DiCaprio) is the best at doing this and at finding the secrets hidden within those dreams.  He is hired by Saito (Ken Watanabe) to place an idea into his business rival's, Robert Fischer (Cillian Murphy), mind.  The request is impossible, the stakes, high, but Cobb needs to do it to gain access back into the United States in order to see his children again. A heist. One last job.  So, Cobb puts together a team of people to help him accomplish this task.  Ariadne (Ellen Page) is the architect; Yusuf (Dileep Rao) specializes in sleeping potions; Eames (Tom Hardy - stealing every scene he is in) has connections and munitions and Arthur (Joseph Gordon-Levitt) is Cobb's right hand man.  However, what none of them realize is that Cobb has a demon in his head in the form of his ex-wife, Mal (Marion Cotillard) that may materialize and wreak havoc while they are working.

The first person that must be praised is writer/director Christopher Nolan.  He has proven himself time and again to be the best director working today.  Is there any other director whose track record is so clean?  He makes films that are great for film geeks and casual filmgoers alike.  The critics love him with great reviews and the audiences love him with great box-office.  Besides the misstep that is Insomnia, I am hard pressed to think of anyone else who is so prolific and still so successful.  Some will say Tarantino but I would argue that Nolan has broader appeal.  I really don't know why more isn't being said and written about him.  He is a master storyteller.  No one else would have been able to cram so much information, at such breakneck speed, into two and a half hours without confusing me, and keep me on the edge of my seat.  Each piece of information is given at such a time that it either connects to what happened not so long ago, or so that we can use it to unlock the mystery that is about to come.  Other directors would have had pity on the "incompetence" of the audience; they would have watered down the plot to help us understand all the information.  Nolan drops us in the middle of a story and trusts us to keep up.  He doesn't bother with details that would weigh down the exposition (How can they jack into other people's dreams?, Who discovered it?, How does it work?) but instead offers it up for us to buy into if we are to follow him. 

The editing is the second thing that must be praised.  The editing room is the final place that a director "writes", and as such Nolan's cutter, Lee Smith, (the one he's been working with since Batman Begins) is a genius.  For thirty to forty-five minutes in the second act of this film there are between four and six different storylines that are going on simultaneously and interrelate with each other.  The deft work done here is like juggling chainsaws.  If one of the storylines is botched and left behind, the whole movie is ruined.  And someone may lose a limb.  Added to that is the unbelievable score that Hans Zimmer, three-time Nolan collaborator, produces.  It is as unrelenting as the editing.  Looking back, I don't recall more then five minutes tops that did not have music behind it, pushing it forward, raising the tension.  There are a few spots in the film where I wished the movie would have slowed down some in order to let us feel the weight of an issue or a decision, and therefore I feel it lost something special in those moments.  However, on the whole, it is a dizzying display of expert editing.

DiCaprio does better here then he has done in quite a while, perhaps because he's not butchering some accent.  His guilt ridden scientist is very similar in tone to the guilt ridden cop he played in Shutter Island.  He is perfect in this role.  After discovering Tom Hardy in 2008's Bronson, I have found every role he's been in mesmerizing.  I'm glad he's going to be getting a chance soon to be a leading man, I just wish it wasn't as Mad Max.  Joseph Gordon-Levitt keeps choosing amazing material to be in, although I do wish the costume crew didn't always place him in the same dapper-looking clothes – shirt and tie with a cardigan again?  Switch it up a bit, huh?  And Marion Cotillard is an unrelenting force here.  The inside joke of having the music that wakes everyone up be Edith Piaf (Cotillard's Oscar winning role) was, I feel, inspired.  Through it all, nothing was regretted by these dreamweavers.

Finally I want to discuss a scene that was in the trailer – guys floating around a hotel hallway.  For some of it, I am still confused as to how they did it.  There are two segments to the scene.  The first is the fight, a fight that goes from floor to wall to ceiling to wall to floor with such ease and fluidity that even Fred Astaire, in all his dancing glory, couldn't have dreamed that film would have come this far.  That was incredible and I can't even imagine how the fight choreographer wrapped his brain around the logistics of bringing that all together.  The second is the zero gravity portion, long profound stretches of time where lots of people are suspended in zero gravity.  That's where I get confused.  I suppose it could be CG, erase the wires that the actors are hanging from, however it appeared to me to be more of what they did for the Apollo 13 film in NASA's KC-135 reduced gravity aircraft.  But how would they have been able to build an entire hotel hallway, room and elevator into one of those aircrafts?  It cooks my noodle, but I love it for doing so.

There are a couple of places where the visuals don't quite work, where the CG lets the filmmakers down.  There is a bit more of The Matrix (people being jacked in, not knowing which is the real reality, heck they even had a hot girl that was a complete fabrication of someone's imagination) and of Vanilla Sky here then I would have liked to see.  And though the ideas may not be completely original, the execution is.  How you react to the ending and your interpretation of the entire film is more a reflection of your personality and your outlook on life.  It's awesome for a piece of art to mean so many different things to so many different people.  Nolan has given us yet another a film that we will be watching for decades to come.  

-- Marco Duran

Share

Purchase your tickets today for Inception at Fandango.com. Get Movie Tickets For Inception


Pre-order Inception at Amazon.comDownload Inception On Amazon


Be sure to visit FlickDirect's Inception movie page for more information.

Login or register to post your comments, and let your voice be heard.

Why Register?
  • Flickdirect is powered by the community. Submit, discuss, and vote on which movie news gets seen on FlickDirect.com
  • Be the first to learn about the latest film buzz with custom email alerts
  • Interact with other members who share your movie likes and dislikes
  • Share your knowledge and write movie reviews that benefit the community
  • Lots of other great features
  • Hey, why not, its FREE!
  • Click Here To Register TODAY!


DirecTV

© 2006-2010 FlickDirect, Inc. All Rights Reserved. FlickDirect™ and Flick It!™ are trademarks of FlickDirect, Inc. No part of this website may be reproduced without permission. Photos & certain artwork used on FlickDirect™ are the property of their respective owners. Studio logos & other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. User-posted content, unless source quoted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Public Domain License.

Go see Inception. It will play with your mind. It is an incredible movie.

Posted via email from More pre-blogspot than pre-posterous

Monday, May 10, 2010

The video (http://bit.ly/hcrduintro) is up for #hcrdu (@healthcampRDU) on May 13-14

This weekend  I have been busy editing videos for the upcoming HealthCampRDU that takes place in Durham, NC on May 14th. The few remaining tickets are available at http://healthcamprdu.eventbrite.com. 

The intro for HealthCampRDU is here:

You can share it with friends via the short url http://bit.ly/hcrduintro

The other video I have been working on for HealthCamp is the fight Disassociated Patient Syndrome (fightDPS) video. Check it out here: http://bit.ly/fightDPS

 

Posted via web from More pre-blogspot than pre-posterous

Tuesday, March 09, 2010

Apple Change Quietly Makes iPhone, iPad Into Web Phones | Gadget Lab

_u3c0355_1

Apple updated the iPhone software development kit on Wednesday to allow internet telephony apps to work on the 3G network. The little-noticed move effectively unlocks the ability for the iPhone — and the upcoming iPad — to be used as web phones.

ICall, a voice-over-Internet Protocol (VOIP) calling company, said the latest revisions in Apple’s iPhone developer agreement and software development kit enable the iPhone to make phone calls over 3G data networks. ICall promptly released an update to its app today, adding the 3G support.

Because the iPad includes a microphone and will run iPhone apps, that means the tablet will gain internet telephony, too.

The FCC on Thursday issued a statement applauding Apple’s policy change.

“I commend Apple’s decision to open its platform to 3G calling, an action that will create new opportunities for entrepreneurs and provide more choices for consumers,” said FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski.

Previously, Apple’s policy had prohibited VOIP functionality on 3G networks — Skype, for example, was crippled so that its voice calling capabilities would only work over a Wi-Fi connection. The only way to use VOIP iPhone apps over 3G was by hacking (i.e., jailbreaking) the device.

Apple and AT&T had a secret agreement to ban apps that would let iPhone users make phone calls using the 3G data connection to prevent cutting into AT&T’s profits. That agreement was revealed in summer of 2009 when the FCC asked Apple and AT&T to explain why Google’s Voice app was rejected from the iPhone store.

After the FCC announced it was planning to extend internet openness rules to mobile networks, AT&T in October 2009 announced it would extend VOIP to 3G networks for the iPhone.

It appears that AT&T’s policy change is only now coming into effect, beginning with iCall and a few other VOIP apps that can now work with 3G.

At the same time, however, Apple has put in a roadblock to true 3G openness, because most phones’ SIM cards won’t fit in the iPad’s unusual micro SIM slot.

“I applaud Apple’s decision to allow iCall to extend its functionality beyond Wi-Fi and onto the 3G networks,” iCall said in a press statement. “This heralds a new era for VOIP applications on mobile platforms, especially for iCall and our free calling model. I hope that now more developers will begin using our VOIP as a platform to integrate VOIP into their applications.”

Though VOIP services offer cheaper calling plans to consumers, Tero Kuittinen, an MKM Partners telecom analyst, said the impact of VOIP on the telecom market won’t be immediate. He noted current VOIP technologies suffer from poor voice quality compared to traditional cellular calls, and with the current state of network congestion, it’s not going to get much better anytime soon.

“There’s a handful of kids who have always wanted to just make their voice calls on VOIP, but regular consumers have not been very excited about it,” Kuittinen said. “With voice over IP over 3G, the quality isn’t going to be there for quite some time.”

He added that VOIP will probably be much more popular when telecom companies roll out their faster fourth-generation networks, dubbed Long Term Evolution.

The move won’t necessarily change things for the famously rejected Google Voice app for the iPhone. Google Voice lets users channel all their calls through a single Google Voice number, which offers cheap international calls, free long-distance calls, free text messaging and voicemail transcription.

Google Voice is not a VOIP service. The calls are placed on a cell connection and use the minutes on a mobile phone. Circumventing Apple’s blockade, Google recently released a web-based version of Google Voice, which can be accessed through the iPhone browser. But that web-based version of Google Voice still depends on the iPhone’s telephone app to actually place the calls.

Google did not have an announcement regarding Google Voice in light of Apple’s new policy.

“We haven’t heard any updates regarding our native app for the iPhone,” a Google spokeswoman said.

Many have speculated that Apple would not allow Google Voice in its App Store to protect its partner AT&T’s profits. When asked why Google Voice was rejected, AT&T said it had no part in the decision, and Apple said it had not rejected the app and was still examining it.

Apple has been considering the Google Voice app since at least July 2009.

Photo: Jon Snyder/Wired.com

See Also:

iCall Download Link [iTunes]

Apple needs to make one other change in their SDK. They need to enable background apps. If the VOIP app is running you won't be able to do anything else (unless Apple is implementing dashboard widgets) that can be accessed while another app is running.

Without background apps the iPad becomes no better than a Verizon smartphone while you are talking on the phone.

Posted via web from More pre-blogspot than pre-posterous

Tuesday, February 09, 2010

AppleInsider | Apple seen extending exclusive iPhone deal with AT&T

Apple's choice of AT&T as the exclusive US carrier for the iPad is less a reflection of the AT&T network and more a recognition of the strength of GSM internationally. Apple gains by simplifying production by supporting 3G GSM network topologies. If Apple doesn't want to produce a custom iPad for the US market it's choice is limited to one carrier - AT&T. Verizon and Sprint use CDMA and PCS technologies and T-Mobile uses a different GSM spectrum.

Until Apple gets a dual CDMA/GSM chipset, or the USA goes with LTE across the board AT&T is realistically the only game in town for Apple.

Posted via web from More pre-blogspot than pre-posterous